irelephant [he/him]@programming.devM to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.devEnglish · 7 个月前We put the Thing That Can't Do Numbers™ in your spreadsheetsprogramming.devimagemessage-square104linkfedilinkarrow-up1901arrow-down18
arrow-up1893arrow-down1imageWe put the Thing That Can't Do Numbers™ in your spreadsheetsprogramming.devirelephant [he/him]@programming.devM to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.devEnglish · 7 个月前message-square104linkfedilink
minus-squareT156@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-27 个月前At the same time, that sounds like something you’d just use old-fashioned sentiment analysis for. It’s less accurate, but also far less demanding, and doesn’t risk hallucinating.
minus-squareThe Ramen Dutchman@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 个月前 It’s less accurate and doesn’t risk hallucinating I might be mistaken, but don’t these two lines mean the exact opposite in this context? Is AI more often right, or more often wrong?
minus-squareT156@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 个月前Both, because the way it’s right and wrong are different. Sentiment analysis might misclassify some of the data, but it doesn’t risk making things up wholescale like an LLM would.
At the same time, that sounds like something you’d just use old-fashioned sentiment analysis for.
It’s less accurate, but also far less demanding, and doesn’t risk hallucinating.
I might be mistaken, but don’t these two lines mean the exact opposite in this context?
Is AI more often right, or more often wrong?
Both, because the way it’s right and wrong are different.
Sentiment analysis might misclassify some of the data, but it doesn’t risk making things up wholescale like an LLM would.