From article:

If you have the Brave Browser installed on your Windows devices, then you may also have Brave VPN services installed on the machine. Brave installs these services without user consent on Windows devices.

More reason to ditch the crypto bro browser.

  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
    15·
    1 year ago

    https://old.reddit.com/r/brave_browser/comments/17b0pxl/brave_appears_to_install_vpn_services_without/k5kwd97/

    https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/33726

    And crypto are disabled by default.

    No, I wont' ditch it. It's the best browser out there, right now, since scummy/corrupt/hypocrite Mozilla (which, remember, is in bed with Google, Amazon and Facebook while criticizing them) decided that Firefox is just a side project for them and they're deceiving people making them believe that donations fund FF development.

    Don't even bother to reply. I'm not going to fuel this shitty thread any further.

    • WastedJobe@feddit.de
      122·
      1 year ago

      "In bed with"=takes their money to have their search engine and lets you change it in 30 seconds while being completely open source

      I don't see the problem.

          • 30p87@feddit.de
            14·
            1 year ago

            0.980s by using ydotool key 29:1 20:1 20:0 29:0 -d 0 && ydotool type "about>preferences\n" -d 0 && sleep 0.26 && ydotool type "search engine\t" -d 0 && ydotool key 103:1 103:0 -d 20

      • flora_explora@beehaw.org
        9·
        1 year ago

        Tbf, changing the default search engine probably has the effect that the vast majority of users will stick with it. So, although it is pretty easy for you and me to change the search engine, it still promotes Google quite a lot and thus undermines the independent character of Firefox as a whole.

        • WastedJobe@feddit.de
          31·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely. I would prefer they didn't have google as the default, but I'd rather have Firefox with good funding and google as default than firefox with very little funding.

          • flora_explora@beehaw.org
            2·
            1 year ago

            I wasn't defending chromium or brave, not even commenting on them at all. I was just adding a caveat to what the other commenter said about Firefox.

      • ByteWelder@lemmy.ml
        6·
        1 year ago

        I applaud LibreWolf’s efforts, but the hard-coded timezone makes it unusable for me. Other than that, it’s a great browser. I used it several months until the timezone confusion got the best of me.

          • ByteWelder@lemmy.ml
            4·
            1 year ago

            If I recall correctly, it was meant as a measure against fingerprinting. It’s basically one less thing to uniquely define a user based on the info that the browser gives to a website. I’m not sure if it’s still like that, cause it’s been easily a year since I used LibreWolf.

          • Baggins@beehaw.orgEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            Yes, what is the deal? I can't say that I've noticed any issues. Am in UK if that makes a difference. And I usually run it through Proton VPN.

            • Aatube@kbin.social
              6·
              1 year ago

              While I’ve never used LibreWolf before (I use Waterfox), that probably does make a difference as the UK is UTC+0.

            • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
              2·
              1 year ago

              Two issues.

              First of all a lot of websites show times in your current timezone. Beehaw for example says you wrote your post “2 days ago”. Depending what timezone my browser is in, that could display 3 days or 1 day. When I hover over it, it shows the exact date/time in my timezone. Which is handy.

              Second it doesn’t actually achieve the intended goal. Even if you use a VPN chances are you’ve set it to give you a public IP address close to you to have good performance. And if your IP address is in Proton’s London datacentre but your timezone is UTC+0 when everyone else is UTC+1… well you stand out like a single black sheep in a flock of white ones and ad networks are absolutely fingerprinting you with that.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      58·
      1 year ago

      It's still a behavior like "we are the best software in the world, once we get admin permission we can do whatever we want without additional user consent, people appreciate it".

      No. You must ask permission to install useless Windows services, even if they're disabled.

    • lukini@beehaw.org
      42·
      1 year ago

      Don't even bother to reply. I'm not going to fuel this shitty thread any further.

      Nah I'm gonna pile on. Firefox is better.