This is the GutHub project by the way:

https://github.com/anarchivist/worldcat

Clearly, a project whose last commit was 12 years ago should be more than enough evidence that she hacked WorldCat.

The problem is with the development ceasing. The source code will remain, but if there’z no dedicated team developing bugs will not be fixed and features will not be added.

Then you should migrate to another service.

https://www.npmjs.com/package/undefined

What do you think about this package? 14,000 weekly downloads…

Clearly like your average Facebook comment section under some inflammatory post. That’s how real men™ sound like.

Absolutely. This just means less resources are required, not no resources at all.

Would you argue for stopping funding for reasearching and combatting rare diseases affecting only a small population? If you were to base funding solely on utilitarianism, you would.

How are non-ccTLDs, like .com any safer? A fascist like Trump could decide to nationalize managing them at any time

Stupid article, here’s a tl:dr:

• Valve ensured CS:GO items (weapon skins, sprays,…) are compatible in CS2 because they’re the source of revenue for CS
• some people compared to this NFTs, Valve responded they don’t know enough about NFTs to evaluate this comparison
• that’s it

Also, Valve has banned NFT games since 2021

Not a member, can you post the reason?

Well, since !fuckcars@lemmy.ml doesn’t exist, I prefer the one that does.

Usually, if there are multiple communities one is significantly more active than the others. For cats, check out these three

• !cats@lemmy.ml
• !cats@lemmy.world
• !cats@sh.itjust.works

Only the last one is what I’d deem active.

Think of it like email (lists). There can be a !fuckcars@lemmy.world and a !fuckcars@lemmy.ml (the latter doesn’t exist, but it could)

You can access both communities, subscribe to both and post to both. Their content is (mostly) identical, the only difference is who’s hosting it.

There is no central authority determining the rules. For instance, Reddit can ban whatever they like and allow whatever they like. That’s not how it works here. The only rules are what each community decides are their own rules. Certain communities, such as !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com no longer exist in some sort of tolerated limbo, unlike on Reddit where they could be shut down at a moment’s notice.

AI and robotics companies don’t want this to happen. OpenAI, for example, has reportedly fought to “water down” safety regulations and reduce AI-quality requirements. According to an article in Time, it lobbied European Union officials against classifying models like ChatGPT as “high risk,” which would have brought “stringent legal requirements including transparency, traceability, and human oversight.” The reasoning was supposedly that OpenAI did not intend to put its products to high-risk use—a logical twist akin to the Titanic owners lobbying that the ship should not be inspected for lifeboats on the principle that it was a “general purpose” vessel that also could sail in warm waters where there were no icebergs and people could float for days.

What would’ve been high risk? Well:

In one section of the White Paper OpenAI shared with European officials at the time, the company pushed back against a proposed amendment to the AI Act that would have classified generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Dall-E as “high risk” if they generated text or imagery that could “falsely appear to a person to be human generated and authentic.”

That does make sense, considering ELIZA from the 60s would fit this description. It pretty much repeated what you wrote to it in a different style.

I don’t see how generative AI can be considered high risk when it’s literally just fancy keyboard autofill. If a doctor asks ChatGPT what the correct dose of medication for a patient is, it’s not ChatGPT which should be considered high risk but rather the doctor.

I’d say the CEO is the only one who’s overpaid. The other executives make between $200k to $370k, which is a lot of money but barely noteworthy imo.