Only reason I could see bringing Toby back would be to kill him off and introduce live-action Miles. And then Surprise! It’s actually a secret crossover event for the Spiderverse, Friendly Neighborhood Spiderman, Venom, and any other loose ends they want to tie into a bow.
I finally got around to watching season 1, and now I’m feeling fairly hopeless about our political situation.
That’s a bummer. How about the Fightin’ Gaelea Baens? It’s a beetle, and it’s pronounced “Jelly Bean.”
There are a whole bunch of minor league team names that are fun. There are teams called the Jumbo Shrimp, the Iron Pigs, the Flying Squirrels, the River Bandits, and all of them have fun logos already available on baseball hats.
There is of course the question of copyrights, but there are three good reasons why you probably don’t need to worry about getting sued. First, it would be unbelievably bad press for any major or minor league or team to sue a bunch of tiny fans. Second, you’ll probably be buying a bunch of merchandise like hats and banners with their logos on it (assuming you aren’t printing your own using their logos). Third, they would probably get laughed out of court at the notion that a multi-million dollar franchise needs to differentiate itself from the sandlot kids in diapers. You’re not profiting from the name or logo (right?), and they have better things to do with their time than volunteer to be the villain in the court of public opinion.
Edit to add some more: Trash Pandas, Rumble Ponies, Sod Poodles, Yard Goats, Blue Wahoos, AquaSox, RubberDucks, PaddleHeads, Hot Rods, Cannon Ballers, and the Baby Cakes.
This build uses older DDR4, which is still ridiculously overpriced, but isn’t fluctuating quite as much as DDR5.
That’s a good idea, too. I’ll probably freeze one and experiment with however much of the other one goes stale.
Which of these guys would be interested in the OC job in Philly?
No, but then it probably isn’t for me. I also haven’t seen Glitter. I might have gone to see it if Coppola was there to lead a discussion on the themes of the film, though. Good or bad, that would be a fascinating experience.
I remember one time at the Philadelphia Film Fest, I saw a terrible movie starring Alan Cumming and David Boreanaz, and while I didn’t think it was a great film, Boreanaz was there for a post-film Q&A. Cumming might have also been there, but it’s hard to remember exactly who was on the panel. I just vivdly remember Boreanaz because he mentioned his dad was in the audience, and he pointed to the guy seated next to me. Regardless, it would be fun to hear any creator talk about their labor of love, their process, and what they were trying to create.
I think this sentiment reveals one of the major flaws within the movie industry, specifically that reviewers feel compelled to watch (and review) movies. But going to the movies is a self-selecting process. If you don’t enjoy Hallmark Christmas movies because they are all the same, or you hate comic book movies because you’ve seen all of them, or you think auteur experiments are self-indulgent and pointless, you can just watch something else. Those movies weren’t made for you.
But capitalism has turned snark into a commodity. People don’t click on glowing reviews. Take-downs, drama, and wit entertain readers the same way that Hallmark Christmas movies do. The audience and the creators attract each other.
If you want it to go away, the best advice remains the catchy jingle by Paul Anka and Lisa Simpsons: “Just don’t look.”
I recently heard someone say that the problem with making fun of a shitheel for something that they can’t help is that you’re also making fun of all the people with the same condition. And they don’t deserve that.
So I’ll apologize to all the people who have become disingenuous dipshits who deny all of science because a worm ate part of their brains.
I mean, that ship sailed as soon as the brain worm guy was put in charge.
Shout is really effective in the moment at interrupting a process. I hate shouting, too, but sometimes it’s necessary (and sometimes I lose my temper, but that’s unintentional and is followed by an apology). Teaching a child empathy is a slow and constant process where the results aren’t always immediately apparent.
You also don’t want the punishment to be emotionally cruel. Like I wouldn’t suggest you take her beloved toy away to replace something stolen. I wouldn’t probibit a child from attending a party or experience that may not happen again. Parents sometimes feel like “something bad” needs to be emotionally devastating, or rigidly absolute. I had a friend in high school who missed his prom because he got a bad grade on an exam.
Regarding the apology being sincere, of course it’s better to make an effort even if she isn’t sincere, but the point is to make her actually feel bad for what she did, not because she was punished but because she understands how it made someone else feel. Some lessons aren’t learned the first time, and the vast majority of people will make the same mistake more than once.
It’s entirely normal, and not a failure of morals or parenting, for young children to lie and steal. She’s learning how to be a person in a brain that’s been conditioned to survive above all else. All morality is built on empathy, and all empathy is learned.
Anger and fear are not the best choice to get her to stop. Punishments and yelling will just train her to hide her bad choices from you. I would absolutely not involve third parties like the police. She is learning how to be a person from you, and if you threaten her with outside societal punishments, she will stop trusting that you are the best source of morality.
It’s important to build trust. She needs to be comfortable telling you when she has done something you won’t like. She should understand and believe that things are better when she makes good choices.
Taking away desserts works as a punishment because she is losing something good. Natural consequences are best because her developing brain will make stronger connections between cause and effect, but you want her to learn to feel empathy for her victim. I wouldn’t ask her to give up something that isn’t
The best response is to have a conversation with her about how it feels to have something stolen from her. Maybe share a story about something that was stolen from you, and ask her to identify the feelings you would have felt. You want her to internalize the feeling of guilt, because that’s the voice in her head reminding her to ignore the desire to take something she wants.
If she thinks, “I want this, but the police might come get me” then the desire voice will whisper “then we better not get caught!” If she thinks “I want this, but taking it will hurt someone” then it makes no difference if she hides the crime from her parents. She might still steal and then lie avout it because she is ashamed, but that’s where the trust pays off. Eventually, you want her to generalize that empathy to think “I shouldn’t steal because this makes the world a worse place.”
TLDR: Don’t yell, definitely don’t threaten with the police, talk with her about feelings and help her understand how it feels to have something good taken away (like dessert). Also, encourage her to apologize, but only if she sincerely feels sorry. You’re not a bad parent, and she’s not a bad kid. People aren’t good or bad, it their choice that are good or bad.
His new moniker is Lapp Dogg
A trial attorney? I could see it she wanted to be like a corporate attorney or real estate or something, where your character as a person isn’t relevant. How is she going to empanel a jury without potential jurors having preexisting feelings about her trustworthiness? “Yeah, she seems sincere, but remember that time on her reality show where she was faking tears for sympathy?”
I don’t know her, or how competent she would be at trial, and anyone can be anything they want to be. But also, recognize that choices have consequences. Maybe trading dignity for fame and fortune means you don’t get to live any dream you like.
Ok, so the coroner and his brother had a hidden room where they kept decomposing bodies, some as long as 15 years. This was discovered and he resigned his position as coroner. A new coroner was appointed.
That coroner’s office also, separately, planned a community event for a Halloween party. The planned Halloween party would have had zero corpses, and the creep who kept the corpses wasn’t invited to attend (probably?). Cancelling the event had nothing to do with safety, in spite of what the unnecessary quotes in the headline would suggest.
That’s fair. I’d go all the way back to Nixon, and you’re right that we are at the end of a long path they have been marching us down.
But I don’t believe they were Nazis. I believe they were selfish, myopic, cruel, ignorant, bigoted, and often simply evil. Not Nazis, though.
Right, my point is that maybe it’s Freudian, or maybe it’s just a brain fart. The larger issue is that we don’t know for sure. Like, if Pelosi had made the same mistake, you could safely assume she isn’t a Nazi. Boehner is a douche canoe and a shitbag bigot, but we’re fairly confident he wasn’t a Nazi. Hastert was a criminal and a pedophile, but he wasn’t a Nazi. Gingrich, Ryan, Michel, none of them Nazis.
Mike Johnson? Might be an actual Nazi.
Yeah, that sounds likely.
Collinsworth throwing shit at the only guy having a great game.