deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It’s mostly extremist left, I just threw in the right so I didn’t get downvoted lol
The downvotes are from Americans. Remember that downvotes are not a measurement of correctness, it’s just popularity and there are more Americans here than any other country
For me it’s the extremist left and right it’s had to block. It really is better without them
People who don’t understand how LLMs work aren’t necessarily of low intelligence.
Don’t get ignorance and intelligence mixed up. People of low intelligence do that
Ah shit I thought the title was free or open source 🤦♂️
Space sniffer. Best and most underrated program to help clear your computer storage from random shit
Because if you’re selfish enough you can enjoy the game at no cost to you guilt free.
I’m just pointing out the facts here.
Food for thought. If you have decided you were never going to buy the game, what’s the harm in pirating it
This man ducks
I haven’t seen anyone complain about duck duck go for several years.
Good point but there has to be a balance somewhere.
If you have extremest moderators in charge of a community which is seemingly unbiased by its name can be misleading. Others will not create duplicate communities because one already exists with that name. And then those mods ban anyone who opposes their view creates a strong echo chamber and a unrealistic and unrepresentative community.
I’m mostly saying this because of moderators of noncredibledefense for example. They will ban people who state they oppose an all out war with Russia, which is madness. Yes it’s a shitpost community but there’s a line.
That’s basically the upvote/downvote button.
This should be an overhaul of the moderation system in general. I find some communities have mods which ban based on disagreement alone regardless of any imposed rules.
I would like to see some kind of community review system on bans and their reasonings where the outcome can result in a punishment/demotion of the moderator who abused their power.
Good point. People are only loud about something if it directly effects them
They get paid in satisfaction knowing big companies are losing money
Agreed, unfortunately you’re right
I would say a good half of posts on Lemmy are too click-baity for me to actually look at. Every title clearly has picked a side and it’s rare to see something even attempt to be impartial
“Untrusted source” is ambiguous fyi