snooggums

When they make low effort cosmetics they are both restricting features that could be in the game and incentivizing themselves to prohibit a modding community that adds a ton to games for free.

Keep hoping!

And not everyone should.

Somebody spent the money on a research team and five years is why it is very attainable now.

Someone trying to write the code from scratch would still take a research team and years to replicate it from scratch.

Like free trials, they keep free in the name just to make sure it is clear and because people like free stuff.

When Netflix was under $10 I stopped pirating and just watched stuff on Netflix because it was worth it for the convenience at the price point.

That is how they solve piracy. Everything they have been doing over the last couple of years is the reason for the increase in piracy.

A creative interpretation of the firearms policies of 1627.

That is what they pretend it is, but sales like that are intended to be FOMO to convince people who were reluctant to buy ‘just in case because it is so cheap’. Like not even someone who balks at the price, just someone doesn’t want to risk changing their mind later.

That is how companies entice people to buy things they were not even interested in before the sale.

While I am the same way with games, there should be a clear distinction between owning something and access to something with clearly defined limitations.

Some shows I watch once, but I am rewatching Futurama for probably the 20th time or so. Sometimes it is nice to revisit familiar things.

They haven’t sued, so they aren’t even trying to stand at this point.

The second one.

“Short term rentals ignored laws for hotels and ride shares ignored laws for cabs, let’s do media and ignore all those laws!”

• AI companies

Individual guns? Why do you keep changing the subject while ignoring the fact that you don’t know the difference between accessibility and preferences?

Accessibility is like colorblind mode, or being able to play the game one handed because the person can’t use two. Things that make it accessible for people who are not able to use the base game setup.

Preferences are things the person chooses because they want an adjustment to meet what they prefer like brightness/darkness, sensitivity, cross hair color, or difficulty.

Call of Duty has sensitivity settings for general (hipfire), low zoom, and high zoom. As in a rifle with a scope that has two zoom settings has three different sensitivity settings that can be set in the game’s settings menu.

Sensitivity settings are not accessibility settings. Learn what words mean.

Many FPS games already have separate sensitivity settings for aim down sights vs hip fire

It’s a handicap, not a feature, it’s why it can’t be tuned or turned off

Learn to read.

Don’t worry, what used to mean organized downvoting now means ‘gets bad reviews’ because no label retains its meaning once it is known to the general public.

Yes, which is why games already have features that make them different…

Many FPS games already have separate sensitivity settings for aim down sights vs hip fire, or even scoped vs unscoped.

Opposite of my experience, FF + uBlock Origin made browsing the web on my phone enjoyable because the filtering of ads makes page layouts readable.

Government websites are really bad about needing to fake the user agent string because of low bidder contracted work that often starts and ends with Internet Explorer/Edge and is rarely updated due to how government budgeting works.