

Knights of Malta do have an observer status in the UN, but they’re unrelated to the Republic of Malta, which the post is about.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_Military_Order_of_Malta
Knights of Malta do have an observer status in the UN, but they’re unrelated to the Republic of Malta, which the post is about.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_Military_Order_of_Malta
no, the communist bloc and non-aligned countries recognised palestine in opposition to the western bloc’s support of israel, right when palestine declared its independence in 1988
just looked it up. the place he went to was literally 2 miles from the white house, in the middle of a fucking 6 million metropolis. honestly, regardless of what the national park said, who chooses a place like that for a swim and expects it not to be polluted?
I love this
why can’t we use passkeys instead of passwords though? is it just a matter of convenience? if so, maybe there is a way to determine a passkey from a password?
please correct me if i’m wrong on this. lots of people here saying that it’s not practical because we would have to trust tiny instances that may be malicious. however, what if we make user’s identity provable to anyone, simply by the use of logic? suppose we have a way of generating random proof-theorem pairs (for example, the theorems could be something like “the largest proper factor of n is greater than some m, where m and n are some huuuuuge numbers and n is semiprime”, the proofs could be constructive). we let the identity be the theorem and the password be the proof. hence, anyone is able to verify the indentity by the use of a theorem prover like Agda
this is a bit like when homophobes get upset over rainbows