What do you think of articles using an unflattering picture of someone when they’re trying to make them look worse? Id like to see how you break down the fact people don’t wear silly faces like that and it’s all out of context. This goes deeper than people realize.
Good. Let the love flow through you. Give in to the light.
8 men who can’t get an erection without gender-affirming boner pills: Young boys have less virility the than 65yo men.
I always thought of Xavier a little bit in terms of FDR and Stephen Hawking. He’s not a character defined by being white but if it isn’t an old white man in a wheelchair then it will probably feel like a different character to me.
But in the overall messaging of X-Men you don’t need the guy in charge of the outcasts to be an upper class white guy for it to work. They just need a wise backbone to build around.
They’re all just like Charlie Kirk. They are all domestic terrorists. And I haven’t even gotten to what outsiders say about them!
If you ask a Christian “Do you think God personally…” and they answer “No.” then how are they a Christian? It’s weird how around 66% of people say they are Christian but they don’t all believe the part where God is revealed by history unfolding. All things are part of God’s plan… but not that!
I don’t get it. Little “drivers” that provide functionality, and then the ability to link button presses to those drivers. And I guess some meta knowledge of ports, standard addresses?
Where is the “requirement” for edge computing? Where is the need for their continuous services?
I thought that most companies doing this at least tacked on extraneous features that then justified their subscription. You’re supposed to pretend it’s necessary! Did they skip that step?
Seems close to being tortious interference / negligent interference. They’re just lying to damage a business.
The expanded form of this sentence:
Toilet won’t give you loo roll unless you visit an arbitrary web page on your personal device and allow people to possibly extract personal information about you, along with implicit knowledge of when and where you might have used a toilet.
Fable’s morality system was actually realistic if you assume it’s depicting what it’s like to be rich and privileged.
The -1 score made me think of how it wouldn’t matter if you could just donate money to get it back.
I participate in the open source community and there’s a huge number of models for the people and we (as in normal people) also steal everything we can. Main difference is money: as a whole we steal more than Meta, but Meta can afford to put it all together and pay millions to train out a model.
Open source AI can be argued to be overtaking corpo efforts, or at least in some areas. Maybe in awhile people will stop assuming AI is synonymous with monolithic corpos.
Does anyone here know what ‘ft’ means? A LoRa adapter? I hardly ever see people talk about AI. They seem to just refer to the surface or the vague idea of it.
“Just say you hate Jews. Just tie me up and say Jews should die. Spank me and call me an evil little Jew. You know you want to.”
“Mr Seinfeld, children are starving.”
We’re going 120 mph into fascism and then Charlie is killed and they go “now you’ve done it! This is a turning point!!” and increase the speed to 130 mph.
Dealing with conservatives is an endless sequence of “this is common sense, but how does that relate to Trumpers?”
Honestly there are aspects about this that I like. In the vein of bomb defusal robots being obviously good. But with, you know, current politics and our chronic issues, it just feels sinister.
Stealing a slur from Star Wars and engaging in traditional name calling to show we disapprove of uncreative slop.
We can’t even think of an original term. We can’t think of a novel way to shit on AI. We just copy what everyone else is doing to make fun of the plagiarism machine.
Cruft can be a hard thing to debug. Mainly when you’re not used to memory issues and haven’t learned all the best practices.
There’s also zig if you want to play with memory. You’ll know a lot about allocation, that’s for sure.
There have been some emotional moments this race. Hadjar has a chance to give this a happy ending.
I bet they still redirect you to bullshit when you try to back out from the site.
I think Verstappen really hates these regulations because if he does his normal thing and drives people off the track, it’s going to be impossible to hide how much it screws over the other driver.
He’s used to kicking over smaller sand castles like “battery level”, “tire temperature”, etc. Now when a driver sets up a move and he tries to cheat it, everyone will flip out because the battery is under a massive spotlight. Instant penalty, complaining about stewards, “don’t think I’m gonna stay for much longer”