unifying demands

hostile takeover

Pick one, you can’t have both.

They need an option for “very uncomfortable”.

An extremely scary survey:

Edit: have a féach at the survey here

He’s obviously lying to try to pretend he’s some media mastermind rather than a cult member/cult leader.

I think the first Guardian article had some value, just because the reporter hung around the Collinses long enough that they indicted themselves through their own actions and words. Whether that outweighs giving two eugenicists a platform to tell people about their beliefs is difficult to judge.

Iirc, whatshisface defended himself by claiming that black parents were more likely to hit their kids, therefore it was racist to criticise him for doing so

Slate says: “For the Love of God, Stop Profiling This Couple!”

The Collinses are ineffective, abusive industry plants from Peter Thiel’s extended circle. They know they’re entirely media creations. They play off that fact to ensure that journalists never follow up on how many initiatives they’ve started and abandoned, neglect to interrogate their contradictory stances on issues like abortion and “race science,” and even seem to accept that they’re openly being taken for a ride by these dorks. Yet in spite of it all, no one listens to their podcast, they don’t really have much of a following, and their specific appeal is concentrated to a few far-right circuits.

The use of the word sincere here bothers me.

deleted by creator

AI = austerity. Replacing creaking but functional systems with crap that doesn’t work is a little bit cheaper, and the money goes to the right people (billionaires) instead of the wrong people (doctors, nurses, cleaners, admin).

Oh yeah Britain didn’t become fascist, they just imposed brutal imperialist exploitation on colonies in Asia and Africa lol. It’s not fascism if you export it!

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

I know!

It’s term time again and I’m back in college. One professor has laid out his AI policy: you should not use an AI (presumably Chat GPT) to write your assignment, but you can use an AI to proofread your assignment. This must be mentioned in the acknowledgements. He said in class that in his experience AI does not produce good results and that when asked to write about his particular field it produces work with a lot of mistakes.

Me, I’m just wondering how you can tell the difference between material generated by AI then edited by a human, and material written by a human then edited by an AI.

The people of Muskogee will have their revenge on Jack Dorsey

A shame. Seems like they were clearly inspired by it … I guess you can’t copyright a vibe.

I hope Toni Basil and the Ting Tings get big royalty cheques.

“Isn’t this a racist thing to say? Not according to Hitler!”

Only got a paragraph in because of the cheerful citation of aporia (the big Nazi website)

I love how he goes on and on about how it actually totally makes sense for the average IQ in Malawi to be 60 because most people don’t graduate school, ignoring that Lynn’s methodology wasn’t up to any basic standard

And by love I mean I fucking hate it

I read it in high school. Iirc, the main character in 1984 deeply hates a woman he works with and his violent fantasies about her are tied up in his desire to rebel against the regime. He later overcomes his desire to commit violence against her by having sex with her. His contempt for her fairly leapt off the page when I read it. I’m sure it’s arguable what Orwell meant or intended.

In another scene, the middle-class protagonists watch a working-class woman hanging out washing and tell themselves that if there was any hope for freedom, it lay in “the proles” (members of the mass underclass, like that woman). But the way they look at her and talk about her is dehumanizing.

It’s probably easier to just read 1984 yourself and make up your own mind. it’s not a very long book.