![](https://lemmy.eco.br/pictrs/image/0fd624b1-4ba6-485a-b683-d308c93888f4.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8800b6b6-0bf4-46da-a359-bca088870729.png)
I did some data mining
Can you share the model?
I did some data mining
Can you share the model?
deleted by creator
That’s sounds like the intro scene from The Fight Club, where the narrator talks about paying extra for handmade cups because they have little imperfections that make them unique.
People arguing with you without acknowledging that this was just an ad in a sea of sexist as fuck ads. Maybe is not as sexist as the average one, but still.
They were pretty sexist tho.
How does more boring tasks like accounting, legal or facilities work?
When people talks about life expectancy 99.99% of the time they mean life expectancy at birth, at every year the life expectancy change. Using this life table someone with 61 years, have a life expectancy of 19.7 years, that means he’s expected to live until he’s 80.
What did you asked ChatGPT? I tried it and straightforward said that the date field wasn’t included on the select statement
https://chatgpt.com/share/80918db9-5284-4a9b-b971-dde78b00497a
Wouldn’t be better to use crontab for that?
You can still analyze this having a normal election system where the candidate with more votes win.
Guess you can do the same exercise with Hilary Clinton in the 2016 election. Select some key counties and turn on the election. Pretty stupid exercise, for a pretty stupid election system.
Start sf the bottom.
Pretty cool bug. Looks like a surreal meme
C/AlwaysTheSameMap
Url check is pretty good
If you are using ChatGPT for academic purposes, start your prompt with “pretend you are an expert professor on {subject} helping me understand {topic}”
https://youtu.be/wjZofJX0v4M your answer from the 22:00 mark on.
I remember watching a lecture about probability, and the professor said that only quantum processes are really random, the rest of things that we call random is just the human inability to measure the variables that affects the random outcome. I’m an actuarie, and it’s made me change the perspective on how I see and study random processes and how it made think on ways to influence the outcome of random processes.
I don’t like the inclusion of 37%, it’s 1/e that isn’t even 37%, is only that because of a pretty arbitrary rounding. Veritasium videos are usually OK, but this one is pretty meh.
Thanks you, I’m personally more interested on the statistics used on the parameter searching, but given that is python I’m checking out to see what can I learn.