that’s like hatin’ on a free drinks and cheeseburgers after smoking the cheeba.

no, that’s Jellyfin. hatin on plex is like hatin on mcdonalds.

no one wants plex’s shitty streaming crap.

by tvOS do you mean infuse? for me infuse’s UI is too lacking, that’s the main thing keeping me from switching to jellyfin.

plex has been making actrocious UI decisions ever since they decided to push their ad streaming service. the enshittification train has left the station.

plex is all aboard the enshittification train. time to start planning your move to jellyfin.

You get you’re in a starfleet sub right, we’re 100% talking about storylines. It doesn’t change anything either way but still.

you get that we can have discussions and make comments that don’t directly relate to any storylines, right?

Point to where I said I do not support socialist politicians. I’ll wait, I imagine your incredible lack of imagination led you to believe the example of cognitive dissonance in my original comment was my actual opinion…

So you’re saying this isn’t your opinion? How am I supposed to know that? This is something you could have clarified in the earlier post where i quoted it.

“that society is ideal but I don’t like anyone that would being about that society"

There’s that assumption again, pointing out what is is does not imply support thereof but sure, strawman it up if you feel that necessary.

Look we’re gonna have to agree to disagree on everything else, but i take exception to being accused of straw manning you. This is no straw man. you said you do not support socialist politicians NOW, but you would if replicators existed. Please clarify if you misspoke.

You: “that society is ideal but I don’t like anyone that would being about that society I just want to snap my fingers and end up in post scarcity utopia.”

Me: “My point is, if we had essentially an infinite supply of food and other goods, wouldn’t you feel more comfortable supporting people who would “bring about” that society? Wouldn’t you feel a moral imperative to support such a society?”

You: “I would”

It’s quite the opposite but sure.

how would it be the opposite?

I would

that’s all i’m trying to say really. The common reservations people have with socialism are pretty much nullified with tech like replicators.

capitalists would not and do not which is why capitalism persists today let alone some future.

what capitalists want doesn’t matter if enough of the proletariat are in favor of socialism. In a world with replicators that would be the vast majority of people, even ones who were hesitant such as yourself.

Canonically they can say whatever they want to make the federation/humans paragons.

My point is, if we had essentially an infinite supply of food and other goods, wouldn’t you feel more comfortable supporting people who would “bring about” that society? Wouldn’t you feel a moral imperative to support such a society? Fantasy tech makes it easy (although perhaps not inevitable).

Discovery only had problematic parts.

well they didn’t do it through political reformation, they did it through fantasy tech. Socialism is quite easy when you have replicators that can make pretty much anything you could ever desire on the spot.

I don’t reject Discovery because it embraces LGBT or POC characters. I reject it because it’s written like shit, especally the parts about LGBTQ characters.

An example of a show around the same time that handled LGBT issues much better than Discovery: Umbrella Academy.

i had to go with emby. jellyfin still has no apple tv app, and no way to bulk edit library item metadata. maybe even more stuff i didn’t get to before i had to abandon it.

still bullshit that this is even a mistake that can be made. and the enshittification will only get worse.

Section 31 in general should just not exist in Trek, let alone get a dedicated series or movie. It is the lest Trek thing in all of Trek canon.

the series was a mess from start to finish, best not to analyze it too deeply.

maybe in another 20 years after nu-trek fails and they want to recapture millennials with nu-nu-trek.

we have to drive engagement.

the writing was on the wall when they removed the unwatched flags. everything is being catered to their streaming service.

So that’s 10.5% of total claims, but the article doesn’t do a good job explaining if this is an actual problem. they are just throwing numbers around without explaining why these claims are being denied except for suppositional statements like these:

Insurance claims can be denied for a number of reasons, including but not limited to insufficient information, missed premium payments, fraudulent claims, or missed filing deadlines. A closed claim without payment is a claim deemed not currently payable by the reporting insurer, FLOIR stipulates.

“There are a variety of reasons why a property insurance claim may be closed without payment,” Mark Friedlander, director of corporate communications at the Insurance Information Institute, previously told Newsweek. “Most likely, these are primarily flood claims that are not covered by a standard property insurance, condo insurance or flood insurance policy. You need flood insurance to cover a flood claim.”