They should issue guidelines that Meta could follow if they chose to.
There should be no arrangement further than that.
They should issue guidelines that Meta could follow if they chose to.
There should be no arrangement further than that.
Wasn’t that already the case in the books?
Yeah ofc females is an issue. We have the word “women” which is more specific and less loaded.
And no, tits aren’t sexual by essence. No body parts are and it’s all social constructs.
Plus lil kids tend to already see lots of tits since they feed on them.
Yes I am weird but I’m also right 😉
The word females is an issue
We have this neat little concept called “women” that is specific to humans and also refers to a social role.
Using “female” is - by opposition - quite dehumanizing.
but if they got their tits out in public in-front of lil kids…. Thats ok???
First and foremost, kids spent their first few monthes suckling on tits. They kinda know what they look like. Or should breastfeeding women hide their breast from their infants? 🤣
Then sexualising parts of the human body is a social construct:
So since human breasts (and any body part by extension) aren’t intrinsically sexual, there should be no issue showing them to anyone, kids included.
(Otoh I am obv not condoning any interactions with any kind of sexual intent with minors or young adults with a significant age gap)
Youre weird af
I am but I am also right 😉
Incel has moved in English from “involutary celibate” to mysoginistic.
I’m not saying you are but you sure speak like one…
Calling women females is at best weird and insensitive for example.
Well at least it’s actually bread?
Yup it sure looks like it.
In order to make the reflection work the bed would have to be angled against the wall.
It’s funny how the brain instantly notices that the perspective is nonsensical but can’t really pinpoint the issue ^^
ilk means kind in this instance.