Idiomdrottning demonstrates a new and often cleaner way to solve most systems problems. The system as a whole is likely to feel tantalizingly familiar to culture users but at the same time quite foreign.

  • 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 30th, 2023
  • Sandra@idiomdrottning.orgtorpg@ttrpg.network•What Do People Think of Daggerheart So Far?
    4·
    7 months ago

    I think this is spot on and I overall dislike the game. One thing that I am a li’l bit interested in is the hitpoints system which seems like a good mix of Fate stressboxes with D&D damage.

    The amount of incoming damage can go to certain thresholds and that has different consequences (both symbol-layer mechanical and diegetic). I think that’s neat and I’m glad to see that experiment carried further.

    How much gold is in that hoard?

    Wow, I had missed that. That’s not good. I mean, CR gets criticized for their “shopping episodes” (even though my own group is even more extreme in that regard) so maybe that’s to address that? Diaspora, for example, just has a “recourses” roll instead of detailed accounting of space credits, and it seems to work well in the context of that game.

    How far does that bandit run?

    I don’t think that’s a fair characterization; range bands is trued and tested tech. Cartesian spatialization is overkill for most game groups.

    @Aielman15@lemmy.world @Shyfer@ttrpg.network

  • Sandra@idiomdrottning.orgtoTechnology@beehaw.org•ELI5: What's the differences between Lemmy and kbin?
    1·
    1 year ago

    Correct, and that’s exactly why it does not work for group things.

    If fedi is like email, and it is similar in many ways, a Lemmy community is like a mailing list. People can send to the list and the threads on the list from different servers. And there can be separate communities about the same topics just as there can be separate mailing lists about the same topics.

    But hashtags in email wouldn’t work as a replacement for mailing lists. Hashtags in email can still have some use, within a mailing list or in a specific conversation, but it’s something very different from a mailing list.

    On kbin, if people think that “Oh, here is where the posts about cycling will show up” but the magazine is just based around a hashtag, there’s no way for people to participate deliberately. It’s misleading.

    Using hashtags as if it were tumblr or twitter is anti-decentralization and drives people into using the biggest instances only. Groups a la gup.pe and Lemmy and Friendica is a solution to that. It’s only a partially decentralized solution, since each group itself is centrally hosted (exactly like mailing lists were), but it’s at least a solution, whereas misusing hashtags that way isn’t.

    @ada @meteorswarm

  • Sandra@idiomdrottning.orgtoTechnology@beehaw.org•ELI5: What's the differences between Lemmy and kbin?
    1·
    1 year ago

    Yes, it works poorly everywhere on the fediverse, is exactly what I’m saying.

    Hashtags on Fedi can be good for organizing stuff within a single account or instance, or it can be used for other things like trigger specific bots, but they can not (as you know) work like an IRC channel like they did on Twitter.

    That’s why I’m not happy about kbin elevating that misfeature and legitimizing its misuse as if it were as robust as the other federated group protocols are. It’s not the end of the world or the worst feature on the planet, I’m not that worked up about it, it’s just not good, is all.

    (Again, not blaming you for that ofc, you only reported on it, and that was awesome, thanks.)

    @ada @meteorswarm

  • Sandra@idiomdrottning.orgtoTechnology@beehaw.org•Greg Rutkowski Was Removed From Stable Diffusion, But AI Artists Brought Him Back - Decrypt
    4·
    1 year ago

    I’m also an artist, for whatever that’s worth, 🤷🏻‍♀️

    Copyright is artificial scarcity which is ultimately designed for publishers, not workers.

    One of the many, many bugs in market capitalism is that it can’t handle when something is difficult to initially create but when copies are cheap. Like a song. It’s tricky to write it but once you have it you can copy it endlessly. Markets based on supply and demand can’t handle that so they cooked up copyright as kind of a brutal patch, originally for book publishers in an era where normal readers couldn’t easily copy books anyway, only other publishers could.

    It’s a patch that doesn’t work very well since many artist still work super hard and still have to get by on scraps. Ultimately we need to re-think a lot of economics. Not only because digital threw everything on its ear and what could’ve been a cornucopia is now a tug of war for pennies, but also because of climate change (which is caused by fossil fuel transaction externalities being under-accounted for—if I sell you a can of gas, the full environmental impact of that is not going to be factored in properly. Sort of like how a memory leak works in a computer program).

    I definitively sympathize with your artist friends and I’ve been speaking out against AI art, at least some aspects of it (including, but not limited to, the environmental impact of new models, and the increasing wealth&power concentration for big data capital).