Indeed it is so.

Nevertheless, assholes.

If the employers are using computers to read my resume, why shouldn’t I used a computer to write it?

Assholes to the lot of them.

Wood.

If you were to use their network to take advantage of the features for anything that the “predator” behind doesn’t care, you’re fine.

But what will the predator care about tomorrow? Or next year? And how confident are you that aggregate data is not what they want, for whatever reason?

Removed by mod

My loyalty is for sale.

RFK Junior is 71 years old. That’s not your shining example of “eventually gong to get himself killed.”

Your reading comprehension needs work.

I didn’t say otherwise.

I have no comment on weather the Korean War was a genocide. I don’t know enough about the topic.

Your statement, that I replied to, was “Nothing in the community rule say that the content should be about established facts”

That is what I understand. But that is not meaningful in this case. Speaking purely hypothetically, there is no reason that the US could not take advantage of North Korean aggression as an excuse to commit the genocide that the article accuses them of.

Should we be learning things that aren’t true?

And in both cases, missing the point. Categorize based on the chemistry, not the source of the chemical.

That’s an untenable position. I mean, Cocaine is a plant, too.

Scientists were so caught up with weather they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.

Not before time.

That would be a planet-eating star, OR a star eating a planet.

Shouldn’t journalists be able to construct sentences?

I find it hard to believe that it’s legal to buy a company, but not it’s contractual obligations. Seems line a hell of a loophole for getting out of things you don’t want to do.

They did make a medical, in very limited numbers, but I’m using the TNG Science/Engineering tricorder.

Very nice.

I have one of the TNG versions, and I am partway through refitting it work lights and electronics. I may even finish, someday.