How is Lord of the rings not on this list?

Wasn’t he introduced with a story of pulling off a miracle to escape the Gorn? Or am I not remembering properly?

I think this is going to backfire as it increases competition for attention and audience

Same thing with streaming. There was a golden age, briefly, before everyone decided to make their own.

Indeed it is so.

Nevertheless, assholes.

If the employers are using computers to read my resume, why shouldn’t I used a computer to write it?

Assholes to the lot of them.

Wood.

If you were to use their network to take advantage of the features for anything that the “predator” behind doesn’t care, you’re fine.

But what will the predator care about tomorrow? Or next year? And how confident are you that aggregate data is not what they want, for whatever reason?

Removed by mod

My loyalty is for sale.

RFK Junior is 71 years old. That’s not your shining example of “eventually gong to get himself killed.”

Your reading comprehension needs work.

I didn’t say otherwise.

I have no comment on weather the Korean War was a genocide. I don’t know enough about the topic.

Your statement, that I replied to, was “Nothing in the community rule say that the content should be about established facts”

That is what I understand. But that is not meaningful in this case. Speaking purely hypothetically, there is no reason that the US could not take advantage of North Korean aggression as an excuse to commit the genocide that the article accuses them of.

Should we be learning things that aren’t true?

And in both cases, missing the point. Categorize based on the chemistry, not the source of the chemical.

That’s an untenable position. I mean, Cocaine is a plant, too.

Scientists were so caught up with weather they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.

Not before time.

That would be a planet-eating star, OR a star eating a planet.

Shouldn’t journalists be able to construct sentences?