Most places have a specific occupancy duration to qualify as a primary home, right?

If not, that seems to be a good option. Primary counts if used by owner for living >240 days of the year (random number but figured it should be at least 3/4 a year or so). Like how we calculate whether someone counts as in state vs out of state for tuition.

He needs to survive just long enough for Republicans to lose the senate and get an empty scotus seat until the next president.

Eh, every other incumbent leader was ousted in this last round of elections post covid though so his normally extreme disqualification might’ve been balanced out

It’s not hard to figure out where people want to go, but is that route full of stable sediment layers/affecting the groundwater movement/at risk of erosion from groundwater movement/at risk of compaction/etc.

There’s a ton going on into environmental surveys for construction

I love it, but can’t get the keyboard to display on mobile

The general US public voted in favor of doing away with norms. Dems tried to keep it up but with the evidence in front of them, why try to maintain the high ground on an unstable cliff?

Honestly leaning towards a “Fuck it, Biden should pull what we think Trump will so we can get supreme court precedent saying “no” since it’s not a republican doing it.”

I’ve seen so many people doing the outrage bit over this.

The American people voted for the felon over law and order, they should get off their high horse when they get a light example what they want.

Third party voters are totally cool with whatever outcome since they know their election nominee has no chance without any third party support from local positions.

Make whatever rationalizing you need to do but if you know what both major parties stand for and you vote third, then you’re tacitly saying that the actual outcome doesn’t bother you as much as the perception you have of being slighted for not doing any of the foundational support work both other parties do.

I get it, you had a reason you couldn’t swallow either pill, but that means you have complicity with whatever the outcome is by your choice.

And the third party protests still can’t garner the 5% they need to be given federal boosts, which just goes to show how little planning and support goes into it.

Stand by your beliefs by all means, but let me know when your protest vote actually changes either major parties stance on anything since it hasn’t in… Ever. Which means third party people are just doing the protest dance over and over with no results.

A non-voters vote changes because people say the abstainers effectively “voted” for whoever won by not participating.

Your personal belief is cool, however a full third of the eligible voters (minus the 3-4% that third/write ins got) did not cast a ballot, and in so doing chose not to be involved.

I hope you also vote for and support the third party candidates that were surely on your ballot for lower positions since of course a serious third party would have plans for ground support before trying to just get into the highest elected position if they actually believe in offering another option.

How long do you think before that page goes missing?

Also, thank fuck the old prejudiced assholes writing laws had the forethought to add that in.

“Ah but you see the constitution didn’t say anything about state boards promoting one religion over others”- those fuckers

He’s already killed tons of people over the years. See his antivax work in Africa.

Which would “change” if the other side won. It’s a decision to not be involved which means accepting either side but not preferring one. A little different than supporting one side over another.

Ehhhhh, of the eligible voters like 33.5% voted for him, 32% voted against, and 34.5% just didn’t participate.

Wild that over a third of the voters still can’t be assed to make a decision.