No, while the best schools in the country have done a lot to incorporate non-traditional educational tools, like Khan Academy, have changed the class time structure, have moved to more “hands on” methods of communicating ideas, and have been moving away from a dependence on rote cram/purge cycles, they will not be scrapping down time, and forcing kids to do things they think are boring. Instead they have more per capita resources to tutor kids on how to deal with their frustrations, scheduling, boredom, and doing things they don’t like, because they have to. They actually have people that will work 1 on 1 with kids to do this, or their parents will hire private tutors to work with them on that, and subjects they struggle with. However, they know that cutting it out isn’t the solution, it is to specifically teach the kids how to deal with it.

This will end well

Heh, It wasn’t world, I bailed there when I saw they banned others for telling people to jury nullify luigi’s case. It was on an account I mostly use for NSFW content, which was not the account I expected to get a ban for political speech.

Cool, I know being a mod sucks, used to do it when I was younger. Just, have had my comments that corpos, having spent decades, and billions, destroying any civil means of change, will mean they will suffer violence for it, get me banned on an instance.

I know from experience some mods don’t see the difference. Which is why I asked.

Would discussion of the break down of the efficacy of civil venues for change, leading to this kind of violence, as an outcome of their own actions, be acceptable?

Until the USSC decides that since congress can hold securities in investments they legislate the industry for, then appointees should be able to do the same.

We shall see, I guess

we shall see, he has been pledging to, essentially, make police legally invincible. He says a lot of things though, however, based on his own personality, this seems like something he would push for.