Very nice. Finish with hairdryer?

Agree but I wouldn’t say “fuck em” to child victims of sexual abuse (as example), or anything else they can’t control.

I get the leopards eating faces part of this, I’m just calling out that there are innocent victims that don’t have any control

Remember you’re talking about kids too. Who can’t consent or make these choices.

When you find a pair that works: buy a bunch. Right then and there.

On the fire crew I found a model from wells Lamont that fit just right and offered decent longevity. I bought 10 pair and was a happy man

I saw a battery operated waterproof one that suggested you could use it in the shower. Seemed better than trying to keep the sink clean

Drones are cheap. The “I point lasers at planes” and the “I fly drones during emergencies” crowds overlap

I know it’s a autocorrect, but “humanely put out of it’s mystery” is exquisite boneappletea

Fediverse users are not inherently good people. They’re just people.

That’s not true, there are instances they are completely out nearly completely detached from the main cluster

The way you said “rather die than admit ozy was right” was stated quite matter of fact-ly

A random Amazon brand but it has the vacuum port on it… I try to ensure they aren’t over stuffed.

I guess I’ve been lucky, I just checked a few I used a few months ago and they are still flat.

I store them under the bed so I guess if they puffed up there isn’t much that could happen

Ok

Pre 2016 reddit front page was not as you describe. I’m not saying it was perfect, I’m saying open conservative concepts were not prevalent or popular.

Imperialism isn’t unique to right wing

If left-wing covers all concepts left of center, and many mild left policy still incorporates capitalism, then it can’t be reduced that strictly. I could agree that progressive or far left policy isn’t compatible with capitalism

Edit either way, we disagree on semantics. It’s off topic for the original question now (I’m not sticking that on you, I contributed to this semantic rabbit hole)

To circle it back, I think there’s a way to invite “normies”, maintain left leaning (even very left leaning) positions, and not compromise the platform.

Edit edit and I think that’s possible without purity testing or shotgunning people with theory

When did I suggest that would be a leftist? Maybe reread. Specifically the end.

He may hold left opinions on LGBTQ+ issues but hold completely contracting, non left wing opinions elsewhere. We can be sure that’s true. He’s certainly not a leftist, and likely not a left wing voter either.

Ultimately I’d highlight that you are doing the.thing: you are purity testing very broad language in a completely useless way

To be hyper clear for you:

Left WING is not leftIST

LeftIST is left WING

You’re ina thread authored by an canadian about “normies”. North American concepts matter.

Edit even wherever you’re from “left wing” (the scope of center to far left) exists, just the starting point of center is unique.

Further, your purity test determination leaves no room for the varied mins of people all over the world. For example fiscal centrists who are socially progressive. You may call that a false leftist, but I’d just say they’re a mild left wing voter. I bet if they weren’t purity tested they’d eventually shift their perspective on fiscal matters leftward.

Point being people hold varied political opinions, sometimes in complete contrast to themselves. I bet there’s some completely theory pure fiscal leftists who don’t believe in abortion rights, or some other bizarre combo

10s of millions of “left wing” (read, the entire spectrum from center to marx) folks believe that, for better or worse.

That opinion is entirely valid as “left wing” but certainly isn’t very left, on an absolute scale.

Seriously people here seem to attach politics to a picture of a sandwich if God forbid the company logo is on the paper to the side.

But an account means nothing, just make a new one on an instance that also aligns with your expectations