![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/u9kB0kgEaN.png)
Alright. Nothing wrong with that, and you’re consistent. But many computer users appreciate the desktop wallpaper feature, so I imagined they’d appreciate this feature. I think I will.
Alright. Nothing wrong with that, and you’re consistent. But many computer users appreciate the desktop wallpaper feature, so I imagined they’d appreciate this feature. I think I will.
Do you look at your desktop wallpaper for much longer?
DDG is inherently bad because it’s hosted in the USA and has to comply with those laws and gag orders. Nothing I’ve heard about Qwant makes it seem like a worse option.
Sounds like the instance admins should contribute. Hiring a third person to sneak ‘moderation tools and data privacy law related issues’ related development ahead in the queue would probably go a long way in stopping to ‘refuse to work’ on it. Or they could straight up actually help build the software.
Taking and posting this photo is the least cringe thing Elon has ever done. He literally looks cool. If you want to make fun of him, just post his Twitter profile.
I agree with OP that block should be labelled mute, and agree with others in this thread that terminology should be consistent across ActivityPub applications and that the current Lemmy behaviour is the best behaviour for a block/mute button given Lemmy’s public nature.
Could Lemmy (if user consensus agrees with it) raise the topic to the ActivityPub developers?
So what exactly is this? Open-source ChatGPT-alternatives have existed before and alongside ChatGPT the entire time, in the form of downloading oogabooga or a different interface and downloading an open source model from Huggingface. They aren’t competitive because users don’t have terabytes of VRAM or AI accelerators.
Why? Isn’t it just a replacement for Sideberry?