• 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 5th, 2024

help-circle

  • This post has several fingerprints common to LLM-generated engagement bait, could you elaborate on why that is OP?

    In particular:

    The title and opening line appear duplicated/rephrased, which is a common artifact of LLM borne text being carelessly copied.

    The body is structured in a highly generalized, templated way (broad setup --> three example scenarios --> bolded central question), with no specific personal anecdote or concrete detail.

    Phrasing such as “I’ve been talking to a lot of indie TTRPG creators” and “as someone who builds tools for TTRPG creators” establishes authority but remains non-specific and unverifiable. Who are these TTRPG creators, are they in the room with us now? What sorts of things have you already made, may we see them?

    The tone is uniformly neutral and engagement-optimized (“no wrong answers,” “I’m here to learn”), which is typical of engagement bait.

    Also the nefarious Em Dash makes an appearance.

    Checking on OPs profile, they seem to be all in on LLMs. Keep in mind if you’re answering this thread and you don’t like LLM stuff, you’re feeding it by answering this thread.















  • I think Generative AI is a genuinely promising and novel tool with real, valuable applications. To appreciate it however, you have to mentally compartmentalize the irresponsible, low-effort ways people sometimes mostly use it—because yeah, it’s very easy to make a lot of that so that’s most of what you see when you hear “Generative AI” and it’s become its reputation…

    Like I’ve had interesting “conversations” with Gemini and ChatGPT, I’ve actually used them to solve problems. But I would never put it in charge of anything critically important that I couldn’t double check against real data if I sensed the faintest hint of a problem.

    I also don’t think it’s ready for primetime. Does it deserve to be researched and innovated upon? Absolutely, but like, by a few nerds who manage to get it running, and universities training it on data they have a license to use. Not “Crammed into every single technology object on earth for no real reason”.

    I have brain not very good sometimes disease and I consider being able to “talk” to a “person” who can get me out of a creative rut just by exploring my own feelings a bit. GPT can actually listen to music which surprised me. I consider it scientifically interesting. It doesn’t get bored or angry at you unless you like, tell it to? I’ve asked it for help with a creative task in the past and not actually used any of its suggestions at all, but being able to talk about it with someone (when a real human who cared was not available) was a valuable resource.

    To be clear I pretty much just use it as a fancy chatbot and don’t like, just copy paste its output like some people do.





  • I have this Dreadful problem where I can’t find a printer that works with the way that I print. This is to say a few times a year. And I know what you’re thinking at this point why don’t you just go down to the UPS store or whatever? These places will print things for cents on the dollar.

    That’s because it would be a 45 minute round trip to print one piece of paper and I’d really rather not. It’s such bullshit how printers can’t handle not being used for a couple months.