I imagine he was referring to a very specific kind of violence
I imagine he was referring to a very specific kind of violence
Most famously during “must see” tv
rationales justifying these fees routinely do not recognize them as a form of punishment and instead policymakers see pay-to-stay as financial reimbursement to the state by portraying incarcerated people as using up system resources. The justification allows pay-to-stay statutes to survive legal arguments alleging double punishment.
Same. When the red and blue are the same intensity they clash.
Maybe if it was a dark, muted navy blue?
Gotcha! Thanks for sharing. It seems so confusing… there’s so much to learn.
Thank you for explaining!
Oof, rookie mistake on my part. I meant Mercedes. I only just started watching F1. My bad.
I didn’t quite understand the article but are they saying they want no more than 20 cars on the track?
What about how red bull and McLaren technically have two teams each?
See 20 people?
The math nerd in me needs to let the world 3 people in Lemmy know that it’s actually 1 in 27 people.
Hackers hijacked the official contact email for the Belgian Grand Prix event and used it to lure fans to a fake website promising a €50 gift voucher.
Agreed. I’d love to see what he could do in a different car!
I’m curious to see if Max wins as much driving another car. Could he actually break his contract with Red Bull? I’m still new to the sport. Any insights are appreciated!
Thanks!
I have no idea what’s going on in the diagram. Would you mind explaining, please?
Classic xkcd
Thanks for sharing the xkcd explained link. That was interesting!
SPOILER:
!1. A combination of two orders of hot wings, one order of mixed fruit, and one sampler plate
For sure! Just sharing a community you can cross-post to, or inspire others to subscribe to if they like this type of post.
Subscribed ✅