• asbestos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lack of certification leading to non-standard implementations that don’t work well with other devices and instability, especially Aqara

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not the guy your asked, but I’d say everything proprietary is a mess, by definition.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            No it is not! It’s a standard, but is by no means an “open” one. Use of it requires paying royalties to the Zigbee Alliance.

            • peregus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Is it? I thought that ZigBee was royalty free and Zwave was not (even because usually ZigBee products costs less than the Zwave ones); is it the other way around?

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                I believe that Z-wave is more open then Zigbee (although it didn’t start out that way, and it’s unclear to me whether it’s completely so now or not).

                Thread exists because it’s meant to be the royalty-free replacement for both of them (and the first royalty-free standard since X10).

                • peregus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  I just had a look at some Z-Wave motion detection sensor and I soon remembered why I chose ZigBee some years ago: they’re soooo expensive! ZigBee sensors costs half/a forth of the Z-Wave ones!
                  Why that? Maybe for the more expensive royalty? More expensive components?

                  • grue@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Disclaimer: I am wildly speculating as someone who has been been paying attention to smart home tech for a long time, but only minimally so because every time I checked it seemed too immature/janky/proprietary/etc. to bother dealing with. (It’s only recently, with the advent of stuff like Home Assistant, ESPHome, Tasmota, and hopefully-imminent Matter and Thread, that I’ve started to dip my toes in.)

                    First of all, I feel like a decade ago Z-Wave used to be the cheaper option. Second, my impression is that Z-wave, as an older standard with questionable compliance/implementation accuracy across vendors, just didn’t work quite as well as Zigbee, which I guess would make it less popular over time and therefore eventually more expensive due to fewer economies of scale.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Maybe it’s just Sonoff products, but Zigbee has never been reliable for me, even for short distances and no walls. It just stops working, I go take the battery out of the device and it comes back.

          • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’ve got a bunch of cheap Tuya devices, they run like a dream. Maybe once a month I need to restart the bridge as a random device will play up. But that’s it. Runs like a dream otherwise.