Mannivu@feddit.it to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoTIL that Truth Social is (was?) based on Mastodonuk.pcmag.comexternal-linkmessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up1199arrow-down12
arrow-up1197arrow-down1external-linkTIL that Truth Social is (was?) based on Mastodonuk.pcmag.comMannivu@feddit.it to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square27linkfedilink
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-23 months agoIs the source avalible? At the end, the license terms are met Knowing how incompetent trump is in everything he does, the people he employedfor the job didn’t know anything about software licenses Edit: I was wrong
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months ago Is the source avalible? An earlier version of it, but not in compliance with the GPL license At the end, the license terms are met No, they weren’t. That’s the point.
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·edit-23 months agohttps://help.truthsocial.com/legal/open-source/ As far as I can see, it’s the newest version of truth/mastadon. What terms of the AGPL license aren’t met. Edit: I was wrong
minus-squareArmok_the_bunny@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoThe problem is that the source code wasn’t uploaded by them.
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·3 months agoWho released it then? I’m not talking about the github mirror
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·3 months agoFine, you’re right, that version isn’t the newest one and isn’t released according to AGPL license.
minus-squarePlasticExistence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoIt’s refreshing to see someone admit they were wrong. It shouldn’t be a big deal because we’ve all been there.
Is the source avalible?
At the end, the license terms are met
Knowing how incompetent trump is in everything he does, the people he employedfor the job didn’t know anything about software licenses
Edit: I was wrong
An earlier version of it, but not in compliance with the GPL license
No, they weren’t. That’s the point.
https://help.truthsocial.com/legal/open-source/
As far as I can see, it’s the newest version of truth/mastadon.
What terms of the AGPL license aren’t met.
Edit: I was wrong
The problem is that the source code wasn’t uploaded by them.
Who released it then? I’m not talking about the github mirror
Blocked
Fine, you’re right, that version isn’t the newest one and isn’t released according to AGPL license.
It’s refreshing to see someone admit they were wrong. It shouldn’t be a big deal because we’ve all been there.