I do not understand you, sorry. The person did not develop the LLM algorithm, and has no clue how it works, I believe, or what includes its initial dataset it trained on with.
At this point, you could claim a result of Markov’s chain a poem, would you?
It’s not art. It’s a ridiculous mockery of such a miracle as art, and I have no idea what you’re trying to state here.
Your examples are not even related to the case, at all. My feelings are not about the result of LLM as fear, scream etc., but its initial use defined as art and, sometimes even understandingly published so that the listener had no idea it was generated in 5 seconds and no actual human was involved or put any kind of personality or effort into, which is ridiculous and nonsense to consider anything but noise.
I do not understand you, sorry. The person did not develop the LLM algorithm, and has no clue how it works, I believe, or what includes its initial dataset it trained on with.
At this point, you could claim a result of Markov’s chain a poem, would you?
It’s not art. It’s a ridiculous mockery of such a miracle as art, and I have no idea what you’re trying to state here.
Your examples are not even related to the case, at all. My feelings are not about the result of LLM as fear, scream etc., but its initial use defined as art and, sometimes even understandingly published so that the listener had no idea it was generated in 5 seconds and no actual human was involved or put any kind of personality or effort into, which is ridiculous and nonsense to consider anything but noise.
The LLM by itself is not the art, the browser system the developer created is.
A blank canvas by itself isn’t art, the painting created on it is.