Now, he’s shrugging off a law Congress passed decades ago to preserve White House papers — and historians are taking him to court.

At stake is the fate of millions of papers and electronic messages — not just for Trump’s second term in office, but for future presidents and people who want to understand them.

Matthew Connelly, a history professor at Columbia University, says the move shows Trump is trying to ensure the presidency “is answerable to no one, not even the court of history.”

“This latest case is just another example of the utter contempt with which they hold not just history but the rights of their fellow citizens to hold them to account,” he said, about the current administration.

  • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 days ago

    To be fair the entire government has ignored 90% of everything the founding fathers put in to ensure things ran smoothly.

    Half because a lot of it was bullshit made up by a bunch of jaded tired rich white folk who basically spent their entire lives either having no responsibility or too much responsibility.

    Half because congress realized by fucking everything they could work even less then they needed too while making more money and having more power.

    Also racism.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      To be fair the entire government has ignored 90% of everything the founding fathers put in to ensure things ran smoothly.

      Oh my sweet summer child, the founding scoundrels plan is going according to plan.

      Which was “for rich by the rich.” from the very beginning.

      Maybe read a history book and not Hollywood movies for history lessons next time.

      • onion_dude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 days ago

        Just sharing a thought in case you’re open to it.

        Its great reading threads where people debate and counter each other. It can change and shape my opinions on all kinds of subjects. But when the threads just name calling it feels kind of gross, and is a real put off the opinions being shared.

        You seem to know the subject, so I’ll bet you’ve got some really interesting points you could share. I’d love to see a tidbit on how the founding fathers did this intentionally.

        Any chance you could share a couple to help give some background to your point.