Found this post super informative as it relates to Mastodon, and thought Lemmy might also benefit from this perspective. I’m not sure I share his optimism, but his points seem sound to dampen some of the alarm bells over Meta joining the Fediverse.

  • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    But it’s probably not legal for them to sell it. The fact that they’ve tricked us into thinking this is normal is part of the problem.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meta isn’t really in the data SELLING business. It’d be counterproductive to let their competitors have access to all the data they do - it’s what keeps their advertising network competitive. Same goes for Google. They don’t want third parties to have access to your data, they want to be THE company that sells targeted advertisements.

    • fidodo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the fine it’s less than the profit they will do it anyways.

    • Methylman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it’s public information why would it be illegal? If I understand correctly the only thing stopping anyone else from doing it as effectively is Meta’s ability to aggregate the data and find the buyers, and perhaps morals.