Proxmox uses LXC for containers and KVM for virtualization. TrueNAS SCALE (now) uses LXC for containers and KVM for virtualization. Is there any use-case left where it still makes sense to run SCALE inside of Proxmox, or is it just as good/peformant to have SCALE handle both NAS duties as well as the other things I would normally run in containers and VMs?

Could I, for example, set up a container/VM that needs especially quick I/O or a very fast single-thread CPU process in SCALE and expect the results to be about as good as they would have been in Proxmox, or is there more to it?

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, I am interested in this, too. Just planning my next home server.

    My thoughts so far: Truenas will be one VM, and some other things I might want to run in separate VMs outside of Truenas. I don’t know yet if I can have complete VMs managed by Truenas.

    • artifex@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You can - I currently have a few “real” VMs running along side LXC containers for Linux-based stuff that isn’t docker-ized yet, and of course a bunch of individual apps (jellyfin, photoprism, etc.) that come from truenas’s library and run in Docker containers natively. So everything seems to be working well, I just wonder if there’s something I’m missing out on (FOMO/grass is always greener, etc., etc.)

  • talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you have a cluster in proxmox it’s probably worth it to keep. I have one for my NAS, one for my webserver, and one for my game server.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    Why would it be slower? Performance should be the same since they are all using the same underlying technology.