Blaze@piefed.zip to LEGO@piefed.socialEnglish · 1 year agoThe 20ish year difference between these two setsi.postimg.ccimagemessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up196arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up194arrow-down1imageThe 20ish year difference between these two setsi.postimg.ccBlaze@piefed.zip to LEGO@piefed.socialEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square26linkfedilinkfile-text
Credits: https://old.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/1lhvdw3/the_20ish_year_difference_between_these_two_sets/
minus-squareBlaze@piefed.zipOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoI guess it depends on the set. I got a similar F1 set recently, and while the reusability is indeed low, the specific parts give quite a nicer looking model. For sets that you want to reuse for creativity, definitely agree.
minus-squareOlap@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoIn days gone collectors would have got diecast models instead. Which I know are still a thing, but Lego has largely supplanted
I guess it depends on the set. I got a similar F1 set recently, and while the reusability is indeed low, the specific parts give quite a nicer looking model.
For sets that you want to reuse for creativity, definitely agree.
In days gone collectors would have got diecast models instead. Which I know are still a thing, but Lego has largely supplanted