• megopie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    The issue is that there are a lot of situations where a file can not legally be copied, saved or shared, and a screen shot by these systems would be considered that. It’s not that the files would be impossible to save or copy as is, but it’s not legal to, and having a system that might do it automatically without human input is a massive legal liability.

    Even if companies in such a situation turn off recall on a system, there is no guarantee that microsoft won’t, at some point, push an update that activates recall on systems that had previously opted out of using it, or even reinstall it on systems that had physically removed the program from their system. Such as was done with programs like edge and Cortana.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’s hard to believe anyone would be legally convicted of a crime because their OS took a screenshot.

      • megopie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        issues around these kinds of legal liability situations are why so many companies hung on to systems like fax machines for so long. Or why so many banks still run on cobol.

        If a company’s machine does something illegal, the company is liable for allowing the machine to be set up in a way that allowed it to happen.

        “Your honor, I didn’t know the computer would do that” is not a viable legal defense.