cm0002@lemmy.world to Space@mander.xyz · 5 months agoNASA 'cleanrooms' found crawling with 26 new bacterial specieswww.usatoday.comexternal-linkmessage-square8linkfedilinkarrow-up187arrow-down12
arrow-up185arrow-down1external-linkNASA 'cleanrooms' found crawling with 26 new bacterial specieswww.usatoday.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Space@mander.xyz · 5 months agomessage-square8linkfedilink
minus-squareskmn@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up31·5 months agoAnybody who has worked in a clean room shouldn’t be overly surprised by this
minus-squareafk_strats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·5 months agoWhy is that? For those of us who haven’t worked in clean rooms
minus-squareVanth@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 months agoYes, hard yes. “Clean room” should not be confused with “sterile room”.
minus-squarescratsearcher 🔍🔮📊🎲@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-25 months agoBut are clean rooms more sterile compared to normal rooms?
minus-squareVanth@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoClean rooms are about particulates in the air and do not address sterile conditions at all. You want medical locations to be sterile, while you want assembly of chips and lasers and shit to be clean.
Anybody who has worked in a clean room shouldn’t be overly surprised by this
Why is that? For those of us who haven’t worked in clean rooms
deleted by creator
Humans are big ol smelly beasts
Yes, hard yes. “Clean room” should not be confused with “sterile room”.
But are clean rooms more sterile compared to normal rooms?
Clean rooms are about particulates in the air and do not address sterile conditions at all. You want medical locations to be sterile, while you want assembly of chips and lasers and shit to be clean.