Is putting another youngster that barely proved himself into the vice championship seat really a good idea? Like, yeah, Perez needed to go, but Lawson? Really? Not that I don’t like him, but he not even drove half a season. It’s Albons story all over again. I hope he can prove himself.
I mean, Hulkenberg is close, and even a lot before Leclerc, in a Sauber. I think we can completely ignore this sheet, unfortunately.
I just hope he takes it as personally as last time and will start giving one world replies again in official F1 press conferences.
Another small hope is that MBS finally gets pushed out and can resume crashing old F1 cars. He was way better in doing that than in being FIA president.
Same here actually, I’m just always thinking it’s very late because it’s getting dark so early. Anyways, thank you!
Dude, just go to sleep. I did not call anyone out, but took both as thruths. What Max said, and what George said. And based on that both are idiots. Try to read it again, maybe with a little sleep before. You can either believe both or say that both lied, and then judge. But just saying yeah VER is right and RUS is lying is just completely biased and not helpful at all.
You’ve shown in a lot of comments (should’ve read it before) that you’re manipulative and just framing everything and actually also everyONE just the way you want. Try to be a little more open and reflect your behavior maybe. Have a good day.
I think you should just stop the discussion, this guy or girl is framing everything just the way he or she wants, leaving out a lot of stuff and arguments intentionally. It’s not worth your or anyone’s time. Lemmy is just another platform for people that usually were on Reddit, so yeah. Have a good day!
What? You are saying „lol George is lying and inventing stuff“ and then going on to frame all that max said as completely correct and the truth. Like, at least be objective to both: if anything, both are idiots here. Max for saying these things, George for pushing for a penalty as hard as he did.
Trying to frame it into one direction by just framing it this way and actively leaving out stuff that was said, and just claiming X is telling the truth and Y is lying does not sound like you’re unbiased at all.
Bertrand Badré, chairman of the committee, and Tom Purves were terminated last summer three days after Badré raised the issue. Badré, a former managing director of the World Bank, and Purves, the former chief executive of Rolls-Royce and BMW, had been working for the FIA on a pro-bono basis.
am i right in that it happened a year ago already, but the story’s just surfacing now?
it’s not even some kind of f1 break and still outlets are publishing articles like this… BREAKING NEWS +++ driver of team 1 wants team 1 to fight for championship !!! +++ BREAKING NEWS
Veeeery interesting how they went from “noooo 100% no they can fuck themselves” to “yes yes its okay” in some weeks. Suuuure thing it’s only coincidence that the DOJ started the investigation and allegedly found the group chat of the team chefs.
Finally. It needed to happen.
from https://www.grammarbook.com/blog/verbs/have-been-vs-has-been-vs-had-been/
The present perfect progressive expresses an ongoing activity that started in the past and continues into the present.
apparently you got a wrong definition, in fact “has been” implies that is was happening in the past and is still happening in the present.
“had been” would be the alternative that defines an activity that happened in the past, in a specific time frame, and is not happening anymore.
sorry, don’t want to sound dogmatic here. i’m also no english native speaker was just curious. but i can understand that it sounds a little like it’s over.
I see how Ferrari didn’t help him at all, and Carlos not being the most obedient when it came to team “orders” today, but Leclerc really doesn’t have anything to complain about but himself and his pace. Yeah, the team could’ve helped him more, but let’s not forget that for 1/3 of the race he was in a perfect position to just overtake Sainz if he would’ve had the speed. On the other side, Sainz overtook him twice…
“has been” does include it happening still, doesn’t it? just to make sure my english is correct here
finally the big story arc completes and my boy ric is back in an RB
but to be honest: i think they will and need to ask for sainz. he is and was in a great form, has good experience, and is (if the media speculation about him having an exit clause that he can leave if one of the big three teams ask him is true) a free agent.
i think it’s about the market in south america. saw multiple comments on reddit explaining it like this: RB doesn’t care a lot about the WCC, they would obv like it, but the WDC is their main target. also makes sense, as this is the thing that is publicly most known and advertised with. RB still won the WDC and has a big market to successfully advertise in with perez in south america. they actually got what they wanted. and i kinda believe it to be the reason. i mean, they are not dumb, they know, perspective and WCC-wise, that Perez is not the option.
My boy Danny coming back and this time he’ll be nailing it, 100% sure, just give him another chance (please)