https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_bollard

“Traffic bollards” or “flexible bollards” seem to be the terms for this type of bollard. They’re intended to guide traffic, rather than to stop it dead as a security measure.

The problem is that you’re not arguing anything.

No, the problem is that you presented no argument. You just presented a false equivalence.

Your first comment is an ad hominem at best

I quite literally addressed what you wrote, and the complete lack of substance. It wasn’t any kind of personal attack. You’re abusing logical fallacies in order to sidestep the fact that you never presented any kind of argument.

Your actual argument boils down to, “AI isn’t complex enough yet, therefore it will never be or is some long time away”. Okay, that’s really not much of an argument. Progress marches on.

That’s better, but you’re still just defining things such that you have to be correct.

Humans spend 90% of their time just predicting the next token. All we need is to mix in a little bit more reasoning and bam, AGI!

See how annoying and hollow that rhetorical technique is?

The fact is that we have no idea whatsoever. We might reach AGI next week. We might never reach AGI. The Chinese government might be sitting on AGI right now. We have no idea, and this is completely new territory that has caused us to question our very understanding of intelligence.

Wow, what a solid argument you’ve made. It definitely doesn’t reek of someone trying to hype themselves up in the face of an unknown threat.

Again, back in the Boomer era, the driver’s license test required you to stop the vehicle using the emergency brake. It’s called an emergency brake because that’s the backup in case the hydraulic (or, before that, purely mechanical) braking system failed. Believe it or not, until relatively recently, people did not have complete faith in their automotive braking systems.

Your comment is just another myth that gets propagated among young people on sites like Reddit, like the one about how windshield wipers turn themselves on when they sense a wreck.

So, you made a long series of bad decisions and now you want to place the responsibility on me. That’s not how the world works. Do better.

Ah yes, the old “I make decisions that endanger others and justify it by calling responsible people privileged” angle. Always a winner.

Yes, that’s why it’s called an emergency brake. In fact, licensing tests used to require that you demonstrate the ability to safely stop the vehicle using it. However, choosing to drive on public roads with only a functioning e-brake is absolutely reckless.

My man, driving on public roads with only your e-brake to stop is reckless. It endangers other road users. I don’t care if this guy burns down his own car and subsequently catches his home on fire, all due to an electrical short, but it will suck if it goes up in flames in a parking lot and takes down some other innocent, poor person’s car.

I was once a struggling, working student driving an older car. I did what I needed to do to keep it running. I didn’t endanger others, however.

“My confirmation bias confirms that it worked out.”

This is no different than writing, “the first ten Google results for Sonoma flasher are…” It’s the most basic, non-contributing information that anyone would get with even cursory investigation. It’s fake-work that doesn’t contribute anything, but gives you the warm-and-fuzzies for “helping”, while most likely muddying the waters with misinformation.

I would bypass the resistor and replace it with a PWM motor controller. Resistors waste energy via heat, and you likely don’t want extra heat in the cab most of the time. As a bonus, you’ll have fine speed adjustment instead of just high/medium/low.